It now seems more and more unlikely that Leon is going to be coming for this next season, and there doesn't exactly seem to be too many other viable options for a Stand off floating around.

Now, I realise that Paul Cooke comes with 'baggage' (although, to be honest, I'm not exactly sure what that baggage is) Perhaps the guy has his best days behind him, and would certainly be considered a risk.

However, he is someone who not that long ago was playing International Rugby, is a playmaker of considerable skill, and a decent goal kicker. He obviously wants / needs a club... and we need a stand off. Could some sort of 'pay per play' deal be possible? A short term deal, where we can get rid if things don't work out as we might hope?

It seems to me that this is a 'no lose' deal. We could sign up him for peanuts, pay him only for appearances. If he causes trouble, then simply get rid of him. If he plays well, then great. Everybody wins! We're most likely going to get Leon anyway in the medium term, so this guy would be a reasonable enough stop gap

Is it such a craaaaaaaazy idea?

It's not a matter of how he plays when he's actually on the field.

It's a matter of what he's like off it. His attitude, his training, his alleged "other" activities and more importantly to me, his influence on the younger players.

If the stories about him off the field are to be believed, no coach in their right mind would want him at the club. The last thing we need is more off-the-field problems.

It says it all for me that even Wakefield don't want him after only 6 months or so of playing for them.

As you've probably guessed, I wouldn't touch him.

Have faith..

I expect the club still to announce at least one signing.

Plus.. wouldn't touch him with a 12 ft barge pole.

I wouldn't touch him with someone else's 12 ft barge pole, nevermind my own. I'd rather not sign anyone else than sign that waster.

If we had no other choice, which I doubt is the case, the only way I'd take Cooke is on minimum wage and a 1 strike and he's gone clause.

But I would only accept his signing for Bradford if it was a case of "there's no one else at all available to play 6" and as we've got Kearney, Southernwood, Royston, hell even Sykes who we could put in at 6 then I don't really see us being that desperate.

Absolutely out of the question, I'd throw on a shirt myself first.

Hmmm. I'd heard he was signing too!

He wasn't even being considered last time I heard, and I don't believe anything has changed since.

Seems that most people are implacably opposed to having him at the Bulls

It's a shame that someone with undoubted talent has got himself into this position

The man's an absolute ar5e. Can't say I'd want him at the Bulls.

agree with that sentiment but find it hard to feel any sympathy for him. He's in a situation entirely of his own creating and has had numerous 2nd chances. wouldnt want him anywhere near us. Would rather give southernwood and addy the gametime.

Rather use a combination of Southernwood/Addy/Kearney

He's way past his best and we don't want that sort of disruptive influence in the camp when Potter is trying to build team spirit.

I would rather have Michael Worrincy back to play 6.