Fair enough.

I'm not TS so I wouldn't know what he'd do having worked with both of them. I wouldn't expect to see Ellis play 13 even though he'd be more than capable in that position in SL and I personally wouldn't like to move our two SR's from their individual positions. So it would be a case of losing one or two sizeable salaries to get him in the squad in the first place or fill the remainder of the squad with kids on low salaries so he can supplement what you already have.

Depends on the team structures, we'd have to adapt to fit in Ellis in the starting 13. For Hull, you've lost Manu to Saints so it's a straight replacement and arguably an improvement although I'm not so sure if you'll play to the same structures this year? Probably a question you could answer better than myself.

Ellis I suppose, just like Willie Mason was a "big signing" for us.


Or maybe he is but you're that caught up in Pearson's propaganda machine that you've lost touch with the reality of what's going on elsewhere with Super League signings.


Craig Sandercock said so on Hull KR TV - I certainly don't think he's a liar.


You asked who was the "bigger" signing - not the "better" signing. Manu is the better signing because he is more of a constant threat but Ellis is the "bigger" signing because his name aids Pearson's propaganda machine to sell passes.

General Zod: providing opportunities for amusing quotes on RLFans for almost seven years.

and only seems to post after the season has finished!

Yep and here's another one:-

In hindsight there was more chance of you signing Prince Charles than Scott Prince #mugs

I like pearsons propaganda machine

green with envy is mr zod